THE END in 2016: The SHOCKING Predictions of 12 Mysterious Men...

THE END in 2016: The SHOCKING Predictions of 12 Mysterious Men...
C. Ervana
Published on May 7, 2016
This video covers 12 men who made predictions about a time period from 2015-2016. These men come from diverse backgrounds, nationalities, and time periods, and yet, they all seem to arrive at the same time frame for the unfolding of prophetic events. Some of these men predicted the destruction of the Vatican, others predicted the beginning of the millennial kingdom, others predicted the coming of the Antichrist, some predicted the coming of the Messiah, and still others believed that the window of the church would close after a 2000 year ministry of the Holy Spirit.

Without a doubt, 2016 was the year to watch among these scholars. Many of them appear to be influenced by the predictions of Isaac Newton, and they cited him in connection with 2016. These men held to a historicist interpretation of scripture, which meant that prophecy was gradually unfolding throughout history. Most believers now are futurists, meaning that they believe prophecy will be accomplished in a short span of time set in the future. Despite this, it is unusual that so many theologians across several centuries seemed to agree with each other on the time frame, and that this pointed to 2015-2016 for the accomplishment of major biblical events.

Please note: None of this video is my own prophecy or predictions. I am NOT A PROPHET nor have I ever claimed to be one. I am a researcher interested in historical texts that point us to the end of days.

Music by: Ross Bugden and Orbital Music

FAIR USE POLICY Below:
US Copyright Act of 1976 17 U.S.C. § 107 allows for the use of work that is used for comment, criticism, or education and is non-profit in nature. Please see the provision below...
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
the nature of the copyrighted work;
the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.