Child abuse

Duma takes another step toward criminalizing possession of child porn

The legislation committee of Russia’s lower house has recommended passing in the second reading a bill ordering up to four years in prison for possession of child pornography without intent of distribution.
The bill was drafted in mid-2012 by representatives of three Duma caucuses – the parliamentary majority United Russia and the opposition parties LDPR and Fair Russia. If passed, it would change the existing practice of punishment only for the distribution and advertising of pornographic materials involving children (this offense can carry from two to eight years behind bars).

The lawmakers preparing the bill for the second reading rewrote the definition of child pornography, as required by the Duma committee. The ban now covers all materials with pictures or descriptions of genitalia of underage persons or sexual relations involving such persons, with exceptions for materials that have recognized historical or cultural significance or those prepared for medical, scientific or educational purposes in accordance with the existing laws. The new draft also recognizes as child pornography any materials featuring adult actors posing as underage persons. The age of majority in Russia is 18.

The second reading into the bill is scheduled for mid-April and its sponsors hold that barring any major obstructions, the ban will come into force from January 1, 2017.

Activists advocate criminal charges for child porn possession

According to the report presented by members of Russia’s Public Chamber in late 2014, the lack of a precise definition of child pornography and working laws to counter it have caused a critical situation with the sexual exploitation of children in the country. The activists named the existence of the “personal use” loophole as one of the major obstructions law enforcers faced when fighting child porn dealers.

“Criminal responsibility for possession of pornography, especially if it depicts minors, is a necessary measure that reflects the community’s very urgent problem. Porn dealers and entire international cartels specializing in this business cannot emerge from nowhere. And no normal person would keep such materials,” Elena Sutormina, one of the authors of the report, said in comments with Izvestia daily.

In mid-2013, Aleksandr Romanovich MP (Fair Russia) told a parliamentary session that the number of Russian websites containing child porn had grown by almost a third in recent years. The amount of available pornographic materials featuring children had grown 25 times. On average, every such site attracts 30,000 visits every month, he said. Romanovich also noted that according to polls, almost every Russian citizen between 10 and 17 years old who regularly uses the internet had received indecent proposals from adult users at least once.
https://www.rt.com/politics/336415-duma-takes-another-step-to/

News
Abuse at the Sisters of Mercy-run Neerkol orphanage has shocked a royal commission
April 17, 2015 9:25am
Michael MadiganThe Courier-Mail

The girl’s dormitory at the Sisters of Mercy-run Neerkol orphanage around 1950.
IT WAS Sister Emile who would clean him up and ensure he had a nappy for the bleeding after he would return, yet again, from being raped by the priest after the evening Mass.

The spirit of Sister Emile, whoever she was, flared briefly this week in the Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse at Rockhampton.

It was the one point of light amid the medieval darkness that appears to have enveloped St Joseph’s Orphanage at Neerkol for much of the 20th century.

SHOCKING ALLEGATIONS: Oral sex, vomit

“Sister Regis” and “Sister Marcia’’ were given credence for being “nice’’ to children who were allegedly routinely slapped, flogged, starved, sodomised and ridiculed by nuns who would place dunce caps on their heads in this Christian refuge for orphans west of Rockhampton, now looming in the public mind as a charnel house of depravity.

But it was Sister Emile alone who honoured her vows of service to the poor and vulnerable, even if she wasn’t brave enough to stick her neck out and end the serial rape of young David Owen.

For the full report:
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/abuse-at-the-sisters-of-mercyrun-neerkol-orphanage-has-shocked-a-royal-commission/news-story/4358c246e9a899b4d2006f869c4e02d8

Still nothing has been done


60 minutes Australia - Westminster UK - high level child abuse exposé
Andy Foley
Published on Jul 19, 2015Courtesy of Australia's Channel 9, broadcast in Australia on 18/7/2015 - disturbing allegations of child abuse and cover ups at the highest level in the UK. (Re-broadcast here in the public interest, without prejudice - no allegation or affiliation to any party is implied.)



Child Killing by Royalty, Soros: Eyewitness
Kevin A
Published on Sep 9, 2014Anne Marie van Blijenburgh, a key eyewitness to ritual child killings by Dutch royalty and other elites including George Soros, describe the murders that have occurred since 2004 in Belgium and Holland. This is part one of a four part statement she made before officers of the International Common Law Court of Justice this past summer, as part of its prosecution of Pope Francis and others for child trafficking and Ninth Circle ritual killings. The other parts of this interview are forthcoming. Recorded live on June 5, 2014 from Holland. See www.itccs.org


Most controversial thing ever said on British TV?
Watch British TV
Published on Jun 27, 2015Watch the whole thing here from British TV: http://watchbritishtv.com/27/06/2015/the-last-leg-friday-26th-of-june-2015-0900-pm/
Whilst covering the recent political climate relating to the economy, Adam Hills, the guest presenter of The Last Leg, exposes a shocking revelation about the British establishment and its attitude towards children.

Nothing will be done, that court is not real & Kevin Arnett is a fraudster.

Cambridge-educated deputy head of St. Benedict’s Catholic private school jailed for horrific stash of porn images featuring children as young as two Home // Cambridge-educated deputy head of St. Benedict’s Catholic private school jailed for horrific stash of porn images featuring children as young as two.


Cambridge-educated deputy head of St. Benedict’s Catholic private school jailed for horrific stash of porn images featuring children as young as two
by Goody in News, Research Comments Off on Cambridge-educated deputy head of St. Benedict’s Catholic private school jailed for horrific stash of porn images featuring children as young as two


photo patten patron_zpstu8at6wv.jpg

BBC chairman Chris Patten is facing claims he helped cover up key evidence about the Jimmy Savile sex abuse scandal.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2521976/BBC-chairman-Chris-Patten-Patten-accused-cover-BBC-Savile-probe-blunder.html

Lord Patten, previously from the paedophile-infested BBC is Patron of the paedophile-infested school where Allott has worked since 2004

The school has been dogged by scandal after one teacher was convicted of nearly four decades of sexual abuse of children and another priest is still on the run from a child abuse charge.

The school and its linked Benedictine monastery, Ealing Abbey, was condemned four years ago for a ‘lengthy and cumulative failure’ to protect pupils in its care from child abuse.

Who on earth would feel safe sending their children to that school?

No statement from patron Chris Patten on the abysmal governance at his school.

Patron:

One that supports, protects, or champions someone or something.

A noble or wealthy person in ancient Rome who granted favor and protection to someone in exchange for certain services.



photo st bene_zpsjakuhppb.jpg
Hi flyer, Cambridge-educated, former Tory councillor, member of David Cameron’s “Big Society” initiative is a member of paedophile ring”


Wonder if Peter Allott has any connections with Patrick Rock ?… another of David Cameron’s policy people charged by police over child abuse images and who has also worked under Chris Patten
Cameron brought Rock back into Downing Street in 2011, appointing him deputy head of the influential No 10 policy unit.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/mar/04/patrick-rock-tory

Rock was deputy head of David Cameron’s policy unit at the time of his arrest and they have known each other since the late 1990s.

Rock became an advisor to various Ministers during the 1990s, including Michael Howard and also Chris Patten

Patrick Rock is due back in court this month – big secret as to the exact date – no mention in msm.


At the time of his arrest, Allott was the deputy head teacher at St Benedict’s
He was identified after intelligence was received that an individual had been using video conferencing facilities to share indecent images of children with other paedophiles around the UK.
Judge Peter Hillen said :
…engaged in public service and political service. Someone who has engaged in charity work. Someone who was a high flyer
‘It was at the drug parties that you became aware of, and addicted to, indecent images of children. I use the phrase of a PAEDOPHILE RING, that’s precisely what that was.


Allott, a former Tory councillor, who served on the Perivale ward from 2006-2010

Peter Allott, 37, worked at £15,000-a-year school in London but now jailed for 33 months

When detectives from the National Crime Agency’s specialist child abuse team arrested Allott in December last year, they found nearly 700 illegal images and videos of children and extreme pornography.



5 May 2016

The deputy head of a scandal-hit Catholic private school was jailed today after admitting getting hooked on child pornography blowing £600 a week on paedophile drug parties.

The Cambridge–educated deputy headteacher became addicted to child sex images and Class A drugs after being introduced to both at ‘chemsex’ parties organised on gay dating app Grindr.

He amassed nearly 400 horrific images of children as young as two, which he kept on his iPhone and on a hard drive in his office at the £15,000-a-year St Benedict’s School.

The private school in Ealing, West London, which counts comedian Julian Clary, Tory peer Chris Patten and actor Andy Serkis amongst its alumni, has been dogged by scandal after one teacher was convicted of nearly four decades of sexual abuse of children and another priest is still on the run from a child abuse charge.

The school and its linked Benedictine monastery, Ealing Abbey, was condemned four years ago for a ‘lengthy and cumulative failure’ to protect pupils in its care from child abuse.

The scandal led to five monks and three former teachers being linked to child abuse.

Allott was working at the school at the time of the abuse

Allott, originally from Barnsley, swapped images with a notorious paedophile, who used the internet name ‘Londonpaedo’ through Zoo. The internet sharing facility allows for an online conference call where perverts could chat and exchange images.
He studied history and politics at Hull University and gained a second degree in theology at the University of Durham.
He became an economic and politics teacher at St Benedict’s when aged 25, and was elected to Ealing Council for the Conservatives in 2006.
After a stint studying in Cambridge, Allott returned to St Benedict’s and was at the time of his arrest studying for a doctorate.
http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/newsgallery/#sthash.DlTlDtHU.dpuf

For the full story
http://loucollins.uk/2016/05/06/cambridge-educated-deputy-head-of-st-benedicts-catholic-private-school-jailed-for-horrific-stash-of-porn-images-featuring-children-as-young-as-two/

My father, Woody Allen, and the danger of questions unasked

Ronan Farrow for The Hollywood Reporter
Updated 2046 GMT (0446 HKT) May 11, 2016




(The Hollywood Reporter)"They're accusations. They're not in the headlines. There's no obligation to mention them."

These were the objections from a producer at my network. It was September 2014 and I was preparing to interview a respected journalist about his new biography of Bill Cosby. The book omitted allegations of rape and sexual abuse against the entertainer, and I intended to focus on that omission. That producer was one of several industry veterans to warn me against it. At the time, there was little more than a stalled lawsuit and several women with stories, all publicly discredited by Cosby's PR team. There was no criminal conviction. It was old news. It wasn't news.
So we compromised: I would raise the allegations, but only in a single question late in the interview. And I called the author, reporter to reporter, to let him know what was coming. He seemed startled when I brought it up. I was the first to ask about it, he said. He paused for a long time, then asked if it was really necessary. On air, he said he'd looked into the allegations and they didn't check out.
Today, the number of accusers has risen to 60. The author has apologized. And reporters covering Cosby have been forced to examine decades of omissions, of questions unasked, stories untold. I am one of those reporters — I'm ashamed of that interview.
Read more: The Woody Allen interview (Which he won't read)
Some reporters have drawn connections between the press' grudging evolution on Cosby and a painful chapter in my own family's history. It was shortly before the Cosby story exploded anew that my sister Dylan Farrow wrote about her own experiences — alleging that our father, Woody Allen, had "groomed" her with inappropriate touching as a young girl and sexually assaulted her when she was 7 years old.
Being in the media as my sister's story made headlines, and Woody Allen's PR engine revved into action, gave me a window into just how potent the pressure can be to take the easy way out. Every day, colleagues at news organizations forwarded me the emails blasted out by Allen's powerful publicist, who had years earlier orchestrated a robust publicity campaign to validate my father's sexual relationship with another one of my siblings. Those emails featured talking points ready-made to be converted into stories, complete with validators on offer — therapists, lawyers, friends, anyone willing to label a young woman confronting a powerful man as crazy, coached, vindictive. At first, they linked to blogs, then to high-profile outlets repeating the talking points — a self-perpetuating spin machine.
The open CC list on those emails revealed reporters at every major outlet with whom that publicist shared relationships — and mutual benefit, given her firm's starry client list, from Will Smith to Meryl Streep. Reporters on the receiving end of this kind of PR blitz have to wonder if deviating from the talking points might jeopardize their access to all the other A-list clients.
In fact, when my sister first decided to speak out, she had gone to multiple newspapers — most wouldn't touch her story. An editor at the Los Angeles Times sought to publish her letter with an accompanying, deeply fact-checked timeline of events, but his bosses killed it before it ran. The editor called me, distraught, since I'd written for them in the past. There were too many relationships at stake. It was too hot for them. He fought hard for it. (Reached by The Hollywood Reporter, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles Times said the decision not to publish was made by the Opinion editors.)
When The New York Times ultimately ran my sister's story in 2014, it gave her 936 words online, embedded in an article with careful caveats. Nicholas Kristof, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and advocate for victims of sexual abuse, put it on his blog.
Soon afterward, the Times gave her alleged attacker twice the space — and prime position in the print edition, with no caveats or surrounding context. It was a stark reminder of how differently our press treats vulnerable accusers and powerful men who stand accused.
Read more: Full coverage of Cannes Film Festival
Perhaps I succumbed to that pressure myself. I had worked hard to distance myself from my painfully public family history and wanted my work to stand on its own. So I had avoided commenting on my sister's allegations for years and, when cornered, cultivated distance, limiting my response to the occasional line on Twitter. My sister's decision to step forward came shortly after I began work on a book and a television series. It was the last association I wanted. Initially, I begged my sister not to go public again and to avoid speaking to reporters about it. I'm ashamed of that, too. With sexual assault, anything's easier than facing it in full, saying all of it, facing all of the consequences. Even now, I hesitated before agreeing to The Hollywood Reporter's invitation to write this piece, knowing it could trigger another round of character assassination against my sister, my mother or me.
But when Dylan explained her agony in the wake of powerful voices sweeping aside her allegations, the press often willing to be taken along for the ride, and the fears she held for young girls potentially being exposed to a predator — I ultimately knew she was right. I began to speak about her more openly, particularly on social media. And I began to look carefully at my own decisions in covering sexual assault stories.
I believe my sister. This was always true as a brother who trusted her, and, even at 5 years old, was troubled by our father's strange behavior around her: climbing into her bed in the middle of the night, forcing her to suck his thumb — behavior that had prompted him to enter into therapy focused on his inappropriate conduct with children prior to the allegations.
But more importantly, I've approached the case as an attorney and a reporter, and found her allegations to be credible. The facts are persuasive and well documented. I won't list them again here, but most have been meticulously reported by journalist Maureen Orth in Vanity Fair. The only final legal disposition is a custody ruling that found Woody Allen's behavior "grossly inappropriate" and stressed that "measures must be taken to protect [Dylan]."
On May 4, The Hollywood Reporter published a cover interview with Woody Allen, quirky auteur. To me it is a sterling example of how not to talk about sexual assault. Dylan's allegations are never raised in the interview and receive only a parenthetical mention — an inaccurate reference to charges being "dropped." THR later issued a correction: "not pursued."
The correction points to what makes Allen, Cosby and other powerful men so difficult to cover. The allegations were never backed by a criminal conviction. This is important. It should always be noted. But it is not an excuse for the press to silence victims, to never interrogate allegations. Indeed, it makes our role more important when the legal system so often fails the vulnerable as they face off against the powerful.
Here is exactly what charges not being pursued looked like in my sister's case in 1993: The prosecutor met with my mother and sister. Dylan already was deeply traumatized — by the assault and the subsequent legal battle that forced her to repeat the story over and over again. (And she did tell her story repeatedly, without inconsistency, despite the emotional toll it took on her.) The longer that battle, the more grotesque the media circus surrounding my family grew. My mother and the prosecutor decided not to subject my sister to more years of mayhem. In a rare step, the prosecutor announced publicly that he had "probable cause" to prosecute Allen, and attributed the decision not to do so to "the fragility of the child victim."
My mother still feels it was the only choice she could make to protect her daughter. But it is ironic: My mother's decision to place Dylan's well-being above all else became a means for Woody Allen to smear them both.
Very often, women with allegations do not or cannot bring charges. Very often, those who do come forward pay dearly, facing off against a justice system and a culture designed to take them to pieces. A reporter's role isn't to carry water for those women. But it is our obligation to include the facts, and to take them seriously. Sometimes, we're the only ones who can play that role.
Confronting a subject with allegations from women or children, not backed by a simple, dispositive legal ruling is hard. It means having those tough newsroom conversations, making the case for burning bridges with powerful public figures. It means going up against angry fans and angry publicists.
There are more reporters than ever showing that courage, and more outlets supporting them. Many are of a new generation, freed from the years of access journalism that can accrete around older publications. BuzzFeed has done pioneering reporting on recent Hollywood sexual assault stories. It was Gawker that asked why allegations against Bill Cosby weren't taken more seriously. And it is heartening that The Hollywood Reporter asked me to write this response. Things are changing.
But the old-school media's slow evolution has helped to create a culture of impunity and silence. Amazon paid millions to work with Woody Allen, bankrolling a new series and film. Actors, including some I admire greatly, continue to line up to star in his movies. "It's not personal," one once told me. But it hurts my sister every time one of her heroes like Louis C.K., or a star her age, like Miley Cyrus, works with Woody Allen. Personal is exactly what it is — for my sister, and for women everywhere with allegations of sexual assault that have never been vindicated by a conviction.
Tonight, the Cannes Film Festival kicks off with a new Woody Allen film. There will be press conferences and a red-carpet walk by my father and his wife (my sister). He'll have his stars at his side — Kristen Stewart, Blake Lively, Steve Carell, Jesse Eisenberg. They can trust that the press won't ask them the tough questions. It's not the time, it's not the place, it's just not done.
That kind of silence isn't just wrong. It's dangerous. It sends a message to victims that it's not worth the anguish of coming forward. It sends a message about who we are as a society, what we'll overlook, who we'll ignore, who matters and who doesn't.
We are witnessing a sea change in how we talk about sexual assault and abuse. But there is more work to do to build a culture where women like my sister are no longer treated as if they are invisible. It's time to ask some hard questions.
Farrow's investigative reporting series, "Undercovered With Ronan Farrow," airs on NBC's 'Today.'
See the original story at The Hollywood Reporter's website.


http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/11/entertainment/ronan-farrow-woody-allen-thr/index.html

END TIMES! PEDOPHILES EQUAL RIGHTS MOVEMENT!
A Call For An Uprising
Published on May 20, 2016
END TIMES! PEDOPHILES EQUAL RIGHTS MOVEMENT!

SUBSCRIBE TO BACKUP CHANNEL!

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv_-yc055n1fxFfTYpdaKBg



https://youtu.be/W9AAwq3vMnE



Gavin McInnes: Why is the Left Promoting Pedophilia?
Paul Joseph Watson
Published on May 20, 2016
Why is the leftist media lecturing whites to be ashamed of their skin color, while telling us to be proud of pedophiles?

Hollywood’s Savile scandal: Star of The Hobbit Elijah Wood says Tinseltown is masking a child sex epidemic

For the full story:
http://loucollins.uk/2016/05/22/hollywoods-savile-scandal-star-of-the-hobbit-elijah-wood-says-tinseltown-is-masking-a-child-sex-epidemic/




Hollywood's Savile scandal: Star of Hobbit films Elijah Wood says Tinseltown is masking a child sex epidemic in its 'seedy' underbelly full of predatory 'vipers'
Elijah Wood, 35, claims young actors are being abused in Hollywood
He compares it to the infamous Jimmy Savile scandal in Britain
Tinseltown is allegedly sheltering around '100 active abusers'
By ABE HAWKEN FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 10:48, 22 May 2016 | UPDATED: 13:28, 22 May 2016


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3603155/Hollywood-s-Savile-scandal-Star-Hobbit-films-Elijah-Wood-says-Tinseltown-masking-child-sex-epidemic-seedy-underbelly-predatory-vipers.html#ixzz49O7OASwl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Jay Parker: How 34 million Satanic/Illuminati Americans keep Earth in turmoil
Alfred Lambremont Webre
Published on May 4, 2013
Jay Parker: How 34 million Satanic/Illuminati Americans keep Earth in turmoil
VANCOUVER, B.C. - In this compelling indepth interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Jay Parker, who was born into a multi-generational Satanic/Illuminati family and received MONARCH trauma-based mind-control as a child, discusses (1) Satanic/Illuminati control of U.S. and world society and religions; (2) His personal life experiences being brought up in a Satanic/Illuminati family; and (3) Inter-dimensional (Luciferic/Satanic) or extraterrestrial forces that interact with/control the Satanic/Illuminati power structure.


https://youtu.be/euOKBjMkk6I

Councils asking 4 year olds of their preferred gender!! WTF
Richie Rich/We Are Change Sussex
Published on May 24, 2016
Brighton and Hove Council ask parents whats your child's preferred gender WTF..... All to confuse your child even more especially about their sexuality .... A(gender)21